Quote:That's a very Skip Williams type of answer: one that obeys a certain interpretation of the spirit of the rules, but not the letter. Here's Freedom of Movement from the SRD:
Q: Does the freedom of movement spell protect a character from being stunned? The argument is that "stun" is a condition that hinders movement.
A: Freedom of movement is one of those tricky spells that has a lot of open-ended wording that might lead to confusion. The spell becomes much more manageable if you just look at it as something that ignores any physical impediment to movement or actions. If you assign this restriction, then it makes sense that freedom of movement works against solid fog, slow, and web; each of these spells puts something in the way of the creature that stops them from moving/acting, or specifically targets the creatures physical movement.
With this interpretation, spells and effects like hold person that apply a mental impediment to taking any action would not be bypassed by freedom of movement. These are mental effects and freedom of movement only helps you bypass physical effects (such as solid fog) or effects that specifically impede just your movement, not spells that stop you from taking any action, as hold person does.
In the same vein, freedom of movement would not work on someone who had been turned to stone by a medusas gaze or by a flesh to stone spell.
To answer the original question, being stunned is one of those mental effects and would normally deny a creature the ability to act at all. Since its not specifically focused on just impeding movement, and it is a mental, not physical impediment, freedom of movement would not help a stun creature to act or move normally.
This interpretation of freedom of movement may make it easier to adjudicate the effects of the spell, but it is also more restrictive. As always, it will ultimately be up to the Dungeon Master to make the best call as he sees fit for his campaign and play session.
Quote:Notice the inclusion of paralysis on that list--which is exactly what hold person does. If it was meant to apply only to non-mind-affecting paralysis (e.g. ghoul touch), it should say so.
This spell enables you or a creature you touch to move and attack normally for the duration of the spell, even under the influence of magic that usually impedes movement, such as paralysis, solid fog, slow, and web. The subject automatically succeeds on any grapple check made to resist a grapple attempt, as well as on grapple checks or Escape Artist checks made to escape a grapple or a pin.
The spell also allows the subject to move and attack normally while underwater, even with slashing weapons such as axes and swords or with bludgeoning weapons such as flails, hammers, and maces, provided that the weapon is wielded in the hand rather than hurled. The freedom of movement spell does not, however, allow water breathing.
Furthermore, stunning is very often not a mind-affecting effect. The psionic power energy stun is magic, but it's not mind-affecting--it can work on an undead, vermin, ooze, etc. just fine. So it's not a mental impediment, and thus this interpretation doesn't even work to provide the answer given.
I'm a little disappointed, Andy. I was used to these kinds of answers when Skip was the Sage, but I've grown accustomed to a higher standard of quality since then. I look forward to the return of your literal-minded answers.

